That’s the query posed by Buntin et al. (2022). The authors used knowledge from the 2007-2018 Medicare Grasp Beneficiary Abstract File after which ran a regression adjustment to regulate for affected person demographics (i.e., age, intercourse), variety of continual situations (none, 1-3, ≥4), and whether or not the person had Half A or Elements A and B protection.
Utilizing this strategy the authors discovered that:
Between 2008 to 2011 and 2012 to 2015, the adjusted annual Medicare Elements A and B per-beneficiary spending development fee declined from 3.3% to −0.1%. From 2016 to 2018, the imply annual Medicare spending development fee rose relative to the earlier interval however remained decrease than within the baseline interval at 1.7% per yr. This slowdown prolonged throughout all sectors inside Elements A and B, aside from physician-administered medication supplied below Half B. Adjustments in fee charges (together with sequestration measures) and beneficiary traits defined 44% of the distinction in total per-beneficiary spending development between 2007 to 2011 and 2012 to 2015, and 63% between 2007 to 2011 and 2016 to 2018.
The authors discover that almost all fee charges tracked pretty near inflation (21.0% over this time interval), however doctor reimbursement solely elevated by 6.5%.
The authors word that their findings are in step with the Congressional Funds Workplace’s discovering that total extra value development—or per capita spending development above and past per capita GDP development —in Medicare between 2005 and 2017 was −0.1%. In different phrases, Medicare spending was 0.1 proportion factors decrease than financial development over this time interval.
