Federal finances: Capital positive factors tax, extra could goal high-income earners

Article content material

We now have a date. Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland will ship Canada’s federal finances plan on March 28, giving us lower than two weeks to take a position about what could — or could not — be included therein, which additionally means time is operating out to do any important planning earlier than any potential tax modifications.

Article content material

Nobody is aware of with any certainty what can be within the upcoming finances, however we will glean some perception on its potential themes from the 226-page pre-budget Report of the Standing Committee on Finance issued final week, which contained 230 separate suggestions for tax modifications and spending.

Article content material

Among the many proposals, the next advice could set the tone: “Undertake a public evaluation to determine federal tax expenditures, tax loopholes and different tax avoidance mechanisms that notably profit high-income people, rich people and enormous companies and make suggestions to remove or restrict them.”

With that ominous theme in thoughts, listed below are some potential tax modifications that might goal higher-income Canadians, together with some potential planning suggestions.

Article content material

High tax bracket

The highest federal tax price of 33 per cent at the moment kicks in at an earnings of greater than $235,675 for 2023, which is a 6.3 per cent bump within the threshold over 2022 on account of the excessive inflation we’ve been experiencing over the previous yr. The NDP’s pre-election platform hoped to extend the highest price by two share factors to 35 per cent. If enacted, this might carry the highest mixed marginal tax price, as soon as provincial tax is factored in, to roughly 56 per cent in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia, and to 57 per cent in Newfoundland and Labrador.

An identical proposal to bump up the highest price for the very best earnings earners was lately included in United States President Joe Biden’s finances announcement earlier this month. He known as for a high federal earnings tax price of 39.6 per cent, up from 37 per cent, for taxpayers incomes greater than US$400,000.

Article content material

Article content material

Surplus strips

The federal government could determine to close down a preferred non-public company tax-planning association that some refined taxpayers have been using to distribute company surplus (basically, retained earnings for tax functions) from their company at capital positive factors charges, quite than on the larger charges for Canadian dividends, or through the cost of a wage or bonus.

The Canada Income Company has beforehand tried to problem surplus strip transactions, however the courts have usually held that any such planning is appropriate, and doesn’t violate the overall anti-avoidance rule, for the reason that Earnings Tax Act doesn’t include a normal coverage requiring shareholders to take away their surplus through a dividend quite than a capital acquire.

Article content material

The federal government tried to close down any such planning as a part of its non-public company tax reforms in 2017, however these proposals have been in the end deserted after important public criticism.

Various minimal tax

Final yr’s federal finances famous that “some high-income Canadians nonetheless pay comparatively little in private earnings tax as a share of their earnings.” To handle this, the federal government introduced a proper evaluation of the choice minimal tax (AMT), the outcomes of which have been initially supposed to return out in final fall’s financial replace. As a substitute, the federal government said {that a} “detailed proposal and path for implementation” could be launched within the upcoming finances.

In fact, we have already got a federal AMT at a 15-per-cent price. The major explanation why some high-income Canadians pay low efficient charges of tax has nothing to do with nefarious tax planning. For essentially the most half, high-income earners are doing nothing greater than claiming registered retirement financial savings plan deductions, charitable donations and dividend tax credit, and incomes half-taxable capital positive factors.

Article content material

South of the border, Biden’s latest finances included a proposal to introduce a brand new 25-per-cent minimal tax on people whose web price is greater than US$100 million. This new tax could be completely different, in that it might be imposed on each earnings and unrealized capital positive factors for the wealthiest 0.01 per cent.

Capital positive factors inclusion price

Lastly, no dialogue of potential finances modifications could be full with out at the very least bearing on the capital positive factors inclusion price. At the moment set at 50 per cent, chances are you’ll recall that the NDP’s platform proposed a hike to 75 per cent.

In preparation for the finances discussions, Jonathan Rhys Kesselman, emeritus professor at Simon Fraser College’s Faculty of Public Coverage, simply launched a paper entitled Pathways to Reform of Capital Positive factors Taxation in Canada that considers the case for growing taxes on capital positive factors in Canada, and the implications for the upcoming reform of the AMT.

Article content material

Kesselman exhibits there’s a excessive focus of capital positive factors amongst comparatively few taxpayers and at very excessive incomes, and means that concentrating on an elevated capital positive factors inclusion price, both on giant positive factors above a sure greenback quantity or by filers with very excessive incomes, would sharply scale back the variety of affected taxpayers, “easing each administration and compliance in addition to public acceptance.”

Biden’s finances proposed the same measure. The U.S. at the moment taxes lengthy‐​time period capital positive factors and dividends at a high price of 20 per cent federally, plus web funding earnings tax (NIIT) of three.8 per cent. The U.S. finances proposed taxing capital positive factors at a brand new high marginal earnings tax price of 39.6 per cent (plus elevating the NIIT to 5 per cent) for taxpayers with greater than US$1 million of annual earnings.

Article content material

If a change have been introduced to Canada’s capital positive factors inclusion price, it might probably be efficient as of finances day (March 28). This implies buyers who worry a bump within the inclusion price might contemplate accelerating any planning, together with a possible rebalancing of their portfolios by taking positive factors now, thereby locking in a 50-per-cent inclusion price. There are additionally extra refined tax methods that might purchase you a while in the event you’re uncertain what might occur to the inclusion price on finances day.

Jamie Golombek, CPA, CA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Non-public Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.

_____________________________________________________________

For those who favored this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.

_____________________________________________________________